Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 30-40, March 2005

Delayed Complications Following EVAR

Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital AP/HP Paris, University Paris XII, Creteil, France

More than a decade after the first clinical attempts, two large randomized studies have proven that endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) provides immediate advantages over open repair. In the long run, however, a relatively high number of reinterventions is necessary to improve the long-term efficacy of EVAR, which may outweigh the early benefits. Since EVAR is gaining popularity in the medical community and in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), it is expected that a growing number of patients will present with delayed complications requiring some kind of reinterventions. For the patient’s safety, vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists involved in EVAR must be well aware of these complications and the ways to overcome them. We began our endovascular program for AAA in 1994 and currently follow 485 patients with a variety of manufactured grafts. In this article we describe the delayed complications observed with EVAR, their mechanisms, favoring factors, and ways to treat them.

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm , stent-graft , EVAR , delayed complications

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1089-2516(05)00035-1

doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2005.03.011

Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 30-40, March 2005