Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 186-191 , September 2008

Selecting Optimal Hemodialysis Catheters: Material, Design, Advanced Features, and Preferences

  • Michael G. Tal, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Michael Tal, MD, MBA, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208042 (SP2-323), New Haven, CT 06520-8042
  • ,
  • Nina Ni, AB

References 

  1. Tokars JL, Frank M, Alter MJ, et al. National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2000. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/dialysis/dialysis00_notags.pdfAccessed June 23, 2008
  2. Allon M. Dialysis catheter–related bacteremia: Treatment and prophylaxis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:779–791
  3. Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter infections: Insights and prospects for hemodialysis catheters. Nephrologie. 2001;22:449–451
  4. Liangos O, Gul A, Madias NE, et al. Long-term management of the tunneled venous catheter. Semin Dialysis. 2006;19:158–164
  5. Ash SR. Fluid mechanics and clinical success of central venous catheters for dialysis: Answers to simple but persisting problems. Semin Dialysis. 2007;20:237–256
  6. Leblanc M, Bosc J-Y, Paganini EP, et al. Central venous dialysis catheter dysfunction. Adv Renal Replace Ther. 1997;4:377–389
  7. Borow M, Crowley JG. Prevention of thrombosis of central venous catheters. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;27:571–574
  8. Trerotola SO, Shah H, Johnson M, et al. Randomized comparison of high-flow versus conventional hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:1032–1038
  9. Alomari AI, Falk A. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: A single-institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:227–235
  10. Saxena A, Panhotra BR. Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: An appraisal of developments in designing an infection-resistant ‘dream dialysis-catheter.’. Nephrology. 2005;10:240–248
  11. Chatzinikolaou I, Raad II. Intravascular catheter-related infections: A preventable challenge in the critically ill. Semin Respir Infect. 2000;15:264–271
  12. Stillman RM, Soliman F, Garcia L, et al. Etiology of catheter-associated sepsis. Arch Surg. 1977;112:1497–1499
  13. Trerotola SO. Hemodialysis catheter placement and management. Radiology. 2000;215:651–658
  14. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358:135–138
  15. Appelgren P, Ransjo U, Bindslev L, et al. Surface heparinization of central venous catheters reduces microbial colonization in vitro and in vivo: Results from a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1482–1489
  16. Thomson PC, Stirling CM, Geddes CC, et al. Vascular access in haemodialysis patients: A modifiable risk factor for bacteraemia and death. Q J Med. 2007;100:415–422
  17. National Kidney Foundation. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(suppl 1):S187–S317
  18. US Renal Data System. Clinical and economic issues in vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access. 2002;1:1–29
  19. Oliver MJ, Edwards LJ, Treleaven DJ, et al. Randomized study of temporary hemodialysis catheters. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25:40–44
  20. Weijmer MC, Vervloet MG, ter Wee PM. Prospective followup of a novel design hemodialysis catheter for the jugular site: Lower infection rates and improved survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:A1575
  21. Schwab SJ, Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: Hate living with them, but can't live without them. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1–17
  22. Fan PY. Acute vascular access: New advances. Adv Renal Replace Ther. 1994;1:90–98
  23. In:  Pieters PC,  Tisnado J,  Mauro MA editor. Venous Catheters: A Practical Manual. New York, New York: Thieme; 2003;
  24. El-Shahawy A, Gadallah F. Acute hemodialysis catheters: How safe are they?. Int J Artif Organs. 1996;19:571–573
  25. Little MA, O'Riordan A, Lucey B, et al. A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:2194–2200
  26. Kairaitis LK, Gottlieb T. Outcome and complications of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1710–1714
  27. Oliver MJ, Callery SM, Thorpe KE, et al. Risk of bacteremia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: A prospective study. Kidney Int. 2000;58:2543–2545
  28. Saad TF. Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:1114–1124
  29. Beathard GA. Management of bacteremia associated with tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1045–1049
  30. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Tunneling short-term central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1452–1457
  31. Lund GB, Trerotola SO, Scheel PF, et al. Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists. Radiology. 1996;198:467–472
  32. Eggimann P. Prevention of intravascular catheter infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007;20:360–369
  33. Funaki B. Central venous access: A primer for the diagnostic radiologist. Am J Radiol. 2002;179:309–318
  34. Ash SR. The evolution and function of central venous catheters for dialysis. Semin Dialysis. 2001;14:416–424
  35. Wright JI. Using polyurethanes in medical applications. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry; 2006;
  36. Solomon DD, Arnold WL, Martin ND, et al. An in vivo method for the evaluation of catheter thrombogenicity. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:43–57
  37. Sherertz RJ, Carruth WA, Marosok RD, et al. Contribution of vascular catheter material to the pathogenesis of infection: The enhanced risk of silicone in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:635–645
  38. Trerotola SO, Kraus M, Shah H, et al. Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters. Kidney Int. 2002;62:282–289
  39. Linder LE, Curelaru I, Gustavsson I, et al. Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: A comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1984;8:399–406
  40. Jones DS, Garvin CP, Gorman SP. Relationship between biomedical catheter surface properties and lubricity as determined using textural analysis and multiple regression analysis. Biomaterials. 2005;25:1421–1428
  41. Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R, et al. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: Comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991;6:722–724
  42. Tenke P, Riedl CR, Jones GL, et al. Bacterial biofilm formation on urologic devices and heparin coating as preventive strategy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23:67–74
  43. Krafte-Jacobs B, Sivit CJ, Mejia R, et al. Catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children: Comparison of catheters with and without heparin bonding. J Pediatr. 1995;126:50–54
  44. Pierce CM, Wade A, Mok Q. Heparin-bonded central venous lines reduce thrombotic and infective complications in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:967–972
  45. Covidien company website. http://www.kendallvasculartherapy.com/VascularTherapy/pageBuilder.aspx?topicID=70019&breadcrumbs=81037:0,70018:0Accessed June 24, 2008
  46. Carmeda company website. http://www.carmeda.com/pages.asp?r_id=2208Accessed June 24, 2008
  47. Trerotola SO, Johnson MS, Shah H, et al. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: Use of a silver-coated catheter for prevention of infection (A randomized study). Radiology. 1998;207:491–496
  48. Bambauer R, Mestres P, Schiel R, et al. Large bore catheters with surface treatments versus untreated catheters for blood access. J Vascular Access. 2001;2:97–105
  49. Chatzinikolaou I, Finkel K, Hanna H, et al. Antibiotic-coated hemodialysis catheters for the prevention of vascular catheter-related infections: A prospective, randomized study. Am J Med. 2003;115:352–357
  50. Touch briefings. http://www.touchbriefings.com/cdps/cditem.cfm?cid=5&nid=2603Accessed June 24, 2008
  51. Bard company website. http://www.crbard.com/news/innovations/HemoSplitDialysisCatheterwithBioBlocCoating.cfmAccessed June 24, 2008
  52. Gilbert RE, Harden M. Effectiveness of impregnated central venous catheters for catheter related blood stream infection: A systematic review. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21:235–245
  53. Hanna H, Benjamin R, Chatzinikolaou I, et al. Long-term silicone central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin decrease rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection in cancer patients: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3163–3171
  54. Darouiche RO, Berger DH, Khardori N, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial impregnation with tunneling of long-term central venous catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:193–200
  55. Angiotech company press release. Angiotech's Novel 5-FU Central Venous Catheter Receives FDA 510(k) Clearance April 17, 2008. Angiotech, Vancouver, Canada, 2008 Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS129447+17-Apr-2008+PRN20080417. Accessed June 24, 2008
  56. PR Newswire (960-Patient study demonstrates zero blood stream infection in patients treated with Angiotech's novel 5-FU central venous catheter). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4PRN/is_2008_March_18/ai_n24928092Accessed June 24, 2008
  57. Richard HM, Hastings GS, Boyd-Kranis RL, et al. A randomized, prospective evaluation of the tesio, ash split, and opti- flow hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:431–435
  58. Trerotola SO, Kraus M, Shah H, et al. Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters. Kidney Int. 2002;62:282–289
  59. Tal MG, Peixoto AJ, Crowley ST, et al. Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow hemodialysis catheters. Hemodialysis Int. 2006;10:63–67
  60. Mareels G, De Wachter DS, Verdonck PR. Computational fluid dynamics: Analysis of the Niagara hemodialysis catheter in a right heart model. Artif Organs. 2004;28:639–648
  61. Beathard G. Catheter thrombosis. Semin Dial. 2001;14:441–445
  62. Twardowski ZJ, Moore HL. Side holes at the tip of chronic hemodialysis catheters are harmful. J Vasc Access. 2001;2:8–16
  63. Warren S, O'Conner D, Steinberg S. Recirculation: A uremic syndromecomplicating the use of prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. J Dialysis. 1978;2:251–259
  64. Senecal L, Saint-Sauveur E, Leblanc M. Blood flow and recirculation rates in tunneled hemodialysis catheters. ASAIO J. 2004;50:94–97
  65. Tal MG. Comparison of recirculation percentage of the Palindrome catheter and standard hemodialysis catheters in a swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1237–1240
  66. Kakkos TK, Haddad GK, Haddad RK, et al. Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: A comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1018–1026

 Michael G. Tal is a consultant to Covidien, Inc.

PII: S1089-2516(08)00077-2

doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2008.09.006

Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 186-191 , September 2008