Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 148-153, September 2010

Radiation Exposure and Uterine Artery Embolization: Current Risks and Risk Reduction

  • Gary Tse, BS
  • ,
  • James B. Spies, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to James B. Spies, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd., NW, CG 201, Washington, DC 20007-2113

Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC

Uterine embolization has become accepted into the mainstream of fibroid therapies and now is among the most common interventions for the condition. Because the procedure is based on angiographic techniques, it requires fluoroscopic and angiographic imaging, both dependent on exposure to ionizing radiation. Given the increasing popularity of this procedure, it is important to understand the potential impacts of this exposure on both individual patients and also the population as a whole. This review is intended to summarize the our current knowledge of the potential risks associated with the radiation exposure from procedure and how those risks might be controlled and reduced by adjusting techniques used during the procedure.

Keywords: leiomyoma, uterine artery embolization, radiation exposure technique

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1089-2516(10)00011-9

doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2010.03.002

Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 148-153, September 2010