Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 188-193, September 2010

Measuring and Monitoring Radiation Dose During Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures

  • John W. Jaco, MD, CPT, MC, USAR

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, National Capital Consortium, Washington, DC/Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Donald L. Miller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
    • Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Donald L. Miller, MD, Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889-5600

The principal problem in measuring patient radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided procedures is that dose is not administered uniformly throughout the patient's body. Four dose metrics have been developed to quantify patient radiation dose for fluoroscopically guided procedures: fluoroscopy time, peak skin dose, reference dose, and kerma-area-product. Each metric must be understood to be used appropriately. Fluoroscopy time correlates poorly with other dose metrics. It should not be used as the sole method to estimate, monitor, or record patient radiation dose unless no alternative is available. Kerma-area-product is a good metric for estimating stochastic risk. Reference dose is a conservative method to estimate peak skin dose and deterministic risk and is recommended for this purpose. Every fluoroscope sold in the USA since mid 2006 is able to measure, display, and record reference dose. Radiation dose should be monitored during fluoroscopically guided procedures, either by the operator or by a designated individual in the procedure room, such as a technologist or nurse. Patient radiation dose should be recorded appropriately in the medical record. Patients who have received a sufficiently large radiation dose should have follow-up at 10-14 days and at 1 month after the procedure for possible deterministic effects.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Army, Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government.

PII: S1089-2516(10)00018-1

doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2010.03.009

Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 188-193, September 2010